Tuesday, August 24th, 2010
Most on the left will never give up in their attempt to remove religion from the court house square. They base their entire argument on the separation of church and state clause in the Constitution. The founders were only seeking to prevent the establishment of an official state religion that they had endured in England where the Church of England was the official state church. They never intended to separate the government from religion in general. Those who differ with this are denying what is clearly stated by the founders and are in fact trying to rewrite history which is full of examples of how the early leaders of this country felt. The founders never envisioned a day when large groups would seek to undermine the Christian values this country was founded upon. This never crossed their minds—this would have been unthinkable and totally alien in their day. Therefore, they made no attempt to incorporate this into the Constitution. It was clear to these early patriots that we were a Christian nation.
Authority and Patriotism
TOTUS Home Page
Filed under: General by Ron Russell
No Comments »
Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

Here at The Concession Stand, NRB’s pop culture division, we are sustained by a steady stream of boneheaded remarks from celebrities grand and small. One of the gifts that keeps on giving is Chicago-Sun Times film critic turned political pseudo-blogger Roger Ebert.
Ebert was recognized by the National Society of Newspaper Columnists as one of the best bloggers of 2010 for his “clarity and depth.” Such an accolade is laughable when you objectively consider an average Ebert post. Far from deep or clear, a typical Ebert rant is a long piece of well crafted gibberish.
This is a preview of
Roger Ebert’s Moral and Intellectual Bankruptcy: 10 Ridiculous Statements Supporting Cordoba House
.
Read the full post (168 words, 5 images, estimated 40 secs reading time)
Filed under: General by Walter Hudson
No Comments »
Sunday, August 15th, 2010
James Madison once said “I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations…”How prescient was he to know that in a mere 200 …
Permanent link to this post (48 words, 1 image, estimated 12 secs reading time)
Filed under: General by Michael Haltman
No Comments »
Sunday, August 15th, 2010
James Madison once said “I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations…”
How prescient was he to know that in a mere 200 plus years a Democrat president would come into power, coupled with a Congress controlled by the same party, who would basically assume the position that zero limitations existed as to the extent of the governments reach?…


This is a preview of
Compromising the integrity of the Constitution by those who feel they can (Video)
.
Read the full post (95 words, 13 images, estimated 23 secs reading time)
Filed under: General by The Political Commentator
No Comments »